2012 has been a fantastic year, for games, movies and entertainment in general besides the filth that is 50 shades of grey. Dark Knight Rises and Avengers somewhat delivered experiences that were equal to their expectations, Looper was an amazing piece of science fiction and INDIE GAME: the movie was a sincere and informative documentary that engrossed and saddened me. 2012 had had been awesome bar a few disappointments, in my opinion. As it is the internet it's always important to preface an opinion based article before I get ranted by anyone and everyone. But is 'hype' ruining entertainment for us, are reviews, scores and grades dumbing down are audiences, lessening our honest opinions and just becoming derivative sheep. Maybe, just maybe.
This all started about a week ago, when reviews were coming out for Django Unchained, which most reviews were brilliant, touting it as the best Tarantino Film to come out after Pulp Fiction, which is a difficult feat in my book as I loved Kill Bill and Inglorious Basterds. But there were some negative reviews, like always, saying that Tarantino is too gratuitous and is just living out his Blaxploitation revenge fantasies. One website, a favourite of mine Spill.com (check them out) said to an extent that the Tarantino name is more than the credit the film is due, The Tarantino name is basically a medium of hype, when a Tarantino movie is released I'm always excited, why?
Tarantino is one of my favourite directors, that is basically why but the excitement grew when reviews were coming out, reviews like 9.4 from IGN, the average of reviews from Rotten Tomatoes in the 90's I was happy and I can honestly say that I will already walk in liking the movie. That's the effect of hype and if the movie is bad I'll just try to justify why it is amazing, which is wrong. This justification comes from reviews and not from my opinion. Which I'm going to change.
Two films that I have been quite disappointed with and quite bored me are Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy and Killing Then Softly. Both critically acclaimed and both gave me the same statements at the end, why didn't I like it?, what is wrong with me? and I need to watch it again. But i've come to realise that my opinion as binary as it is, is my own. Reviews and sites like Rotten Tomatoes somewhat build up a movie and give me expectations of greatness when really everything is subjective, case in point Blade Runner.
Blade Runner is one of the greatest films of all time, of all time (according to IMDB's top 250) and I disagree. For it's time it must have been amazing and the sets are fantastic but I just felt a little underwhelmed by the story, I can appreciate the craft of the film but I never felt truly captivated in the setting or the story. Again I'm gonna blame myself for not enjoying it, It didn't look the best because my settings were wrong or that I did't get the right cut, but after the film had ended I felt quite disappointed. But I'll give it another shot, because I'm like that, fickle bastard.
But it can always work the opposite way, take for example The Hobbit, it got mediocre reviews and I had lost some drive to even see the film. But I was dragged and looking back, I'm glad I was. Though the Hobbit does't compare to the greatness to the Lord Of The Rings trilogy it is still a fantastic movie and I somewhat appreciated it more because it exceeded my low expectations. But I had high expectation initially because it was a prequel to the LOrd of The Rings, it's just a paradox
So in conclusion, if you're interested in a film, don't always take others opinions and make your own god damn mind up about a film. Or don't, don't listen to my opinion about others opinions that affect your opinion.